"Our objective is complete freedom,, complete justice, complete equality, by any means necessary." - Malcom X

Complete freedom is the ability to do what you can, without hindrance because of what others think you are. that is, the ability to be true to one's own nature. Freedom is often confused with equality, but freedom is concerned with equality 'from the start', not equality of 'outcome'. This happens because freedom is not justice. Complete justice is when you get what you deserve, and are not denied what you deserve because someone else gets something they do not deserve. Under the understanding that "all men are created equal", we should then expect to see roughly equal outcomes between any large enough groups of people. If we do not, then that suggests that we do not have complete equality between those two groups. If X does not equal Y, then either there is some inherent difference between X and Y, or X and Y seem different to us, from a point of view, because we are looking at them in different ways. Since we know that there is no large and inherent difference between large enough groups of human beings, that must mean that inequality between large enough groups of people is due to us, and not us and them. 

We know there are no major differences, but what does that mean? Certainly there are differences of a sort between any two large groups of people, such as color, nation, language, health, or work. Indeed, we would be surprised to see exact equality between two groups of people. So, what we are looking for is equality within a range - not an absolute range, but a relative range. We expect that these two groups of people would be on average similar enough to each other that if we mixed them together again and then separate them into two different groups again, but not two groups exactly like the old groups, that we would see the same relative equality, or general similarity of difference, between those two new groups. If there is a difference between two groups where one group is not similar to the other group, then there is a reason for that difference. Thus, while you can easily pick any two groups and show that there is a difference between them, it takes time and effort to prove that there is no difference between those two groups. Here then, is one of the problems of groupism or racism - that it is easier to say and show that some group is different than another by picking your examples, then it is to debunk that claim. Moreover, an understanding of the debunking of the claim of difference requires an open mind willing to accept proof to the contrary of what you believe or what is advantageous for you, and groupism, and racism, are not generally associated with such open attitudes. It requires more energy and force to remove a prejudice than it does to maintain it. 

To be willing to do absolutely anything to achieve what you want requires a conviction to last through hard times, a hard enough nail to drive a hole in an inflated ego or hard-shelled bunker to let the air circulate, patience to wait for the youth, who seek out the scent of free air like a bear seeks honey, and the ability to live in a glass house. The first three are easily found, if not easily directed, but the fourth is exceedingly rare because it does not at first appear to be necessary. However, you will find that complete freedom, and complete justice, to be achieved, require complete responsibility. 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

“The highest art…sets down its creations and trusts in their magic, without fear of not being understood.” - Herman Hesse

  “The highest art…sets down its creations and trusts in their magic, without fear of not being understood.” - Herman Hesse (1877-1962). Reflections, 516, ed. Volker Michels, 1974 It is a terribly frightening thing, to send your art out into the world. Who are you to have created something which is worthy of remembrance, worthy of care, worthy of immortality? We are always afraid of two things when we show somebody our art - We have the fear that it will seem unremarkable, and we have the fear that it will be totally misunderstood. As regards the fear of our art being unremarkable, there is no sure way to tell that it is remarkable for other people except by showing it to them. The only way we can even begin to guess whether it will be so is by trusting in ourselves, and in our own sense of good and bad. We constantly alternate between being the most brutal and the most forgiving of our critics, for we may look on a doodle we dew or a poem we wrote in the middle of a rainstorm, o...
Read more

"Never argue with a man whose job depends on not being convinced.” - H.L. Mencken

  "Never argue with a man whose job depends on not being convinced.” - H.L. Mencken (1806-1956). In Christopher Matthews, Hardball: How Politics Is Played - Told by One Who Knows the Game, 2, 1988 When is it worth trying to convince someone, and when is it not worth the effort? It is perhaps too simple to say that this always depends on the odds of them being convinced, because it may be very important that they be convinced - Important enough that the odds don't matter, you still have to try. However, in some cases, this will never work. That is, if the person you are trying to convince has a vested interest in not being convinced, then it is very likely that you should not waste your time trying to convince him. Instead, you should aim to change his mind by some other means than argument. You may want to try and convince him not that you are right and he is wrong, but that he actually has a vested interest in holding to your view. You may try and direct him to do what you ...
Read more

“An army, like a serpent, travels on its belly.” - Frederick II

  “An army, like a serpent, travels on its belly.” - Frederick II (1712-1786). Attributed See Statesmen: B.H. Liddell Hart (2) An army travels in its belly. It runs on food, on supplies, on oil and blood. It runs itself into the ground, it runs itself ragged, it runs itself into a state of dire need for repair, simply by the regular maintenance of its machines, the standard training it needs, and the slow drip of experience caused by the old and wise constantly leaving, while the young and foolish are always entering. Battles, battles are won by the courage of the people who fight them, the advantages in technology and Intel one side has over the other, and by clever and quick commanders. However, one of the most important lessons of War comes to us out of antiquity, by way of our phrase 'A Pyrrhic Victory' - This event is named after king Pyrrus, an ancient king of Epirus in Greece, who won a great victory - and lost a war, because he paid too terrible a price for his win, a...
Read more